« AI: expert systems and Cyc | Main | IBM Aims To Simulate A Brain »

June 07, 2005

1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument

[Defrag David’s Brain] Successful workshops have been associated with major Artificial Intelligence Conferences, notably the workshop series on Computational Models of Natural Argument held in conjunction with IJCAI and ECAI, and the series of ArgMAS workshops held in conjunction with AAMAS. The time is now right for a conference dedicated to all aspects of computational argument.

Some slightly related from Technorati and Google.

[Online Deliberation 2005] 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA06): Over the past decade argumentation has become increasingly important in Artificial Intelligence. It has provided a fruitful way of approaching non-monotonic and defeasible reasoning, deliberation about action, and agent communication scenarios such as negotiation. In application domains such as law, medicine and e-democracy it has come to be seen as an essential part of the reasoning.

Blogs.msdn.com[Blogs.msdn.com] MSR - eScience :: Today I’m at the International Conference on Computational Science 2005 (ICCS 2005): "Advancing Science through Computation" at Emory University in Atlanta.  I’m here to give a short industry talk on “eScience with Databases and Web Services” and will highlight some of the eScience projects I support as well as push the use of databases exposed as web services and consumed by smart clients to help solve scientific research problems. 

http://weblog.fortnow.com [Weblog.fortnow.com] Computational Complexity: STOC Business Meeting: Hi Lance, I've been looking to say hello to you at STOC, but haven't spotted you just yet. Long-time reader and fan of your blog; maybe I'll see you at my talk on Tuesday afternoon.

http://weblog.fortnow.com [Weblog.fortnow.com] Computational Complexity: Conference Presentations: However, at STOC I (and other people I talked to) noticed a disturbing trend: a tendency for authors to remove almost everything technical from their talks. This seemed to 'dumb-down' some of the conference talks I attended.

Cs.uu.nlhttp://www.cs.uu.nl [Cs.uu.nl] Debate etc: My work on disagreement in legal reasoning and on defeasible argumentation has made me interested in debate, group decision making and negotiation. During my work in the Zeno group at the GMD Bonn, I started studying the formal and computational modelling of Robert's Rules of Order, the standard parliamentary procedure in the USA. This study is meant to provide insights into the use of rules of order for regulating WWW-based debate and group decision making. I have written a report and a paper on this work, the latter with Tom Gordon.

[Bengal-ng.missouri.edu] Certain Doubts » Austin-Berkeley Annual Formal Epistemology ...: The purpose of these workshops will be to bring together individuals, both faculty and graduate students, using mathematical methods in epistemology in small focused meetings. Topics treated will include but are not limited to:

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, ,

Posted at June 7, 2005 11:30 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?